Can radiocarbon dating be trusted

Can radiocarbon dating be trusted

When lava at the ridges hardens, it keeps a trace of the magnetism of the earth's magnetic field. Other species of trees corroborate the work that Ferguson did with bristlecone pines.

Barnes has claimed that the earth's magnetic field is decaying exponentially with a half-life of fourteen hundred years. These bands are thousands of kilometers long, they vary in width, they lie parallel, and the bands on either side of any given ridge form mirror images of each other. The fact is, in reality, the strata is radiometrically dated in which the fossils are contained. Like Cook, Barnes looks at only part of the evidence. Relative dating sedimentary rock is generally what is most misunderstood and erroneously described, especially in the creation science literature as circular reasoning.

They have their work cut

Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen N into carbon C or radiocarbon. They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods.

So, in the end, external evidence reconciles with and often confirms even controversial C dates. Relative dating of sedimentary strata is by the use of index fossils.

Actually there are a number of different methods which include radiometric, non-radiometric, and relative dating. By measuring the age of stars, which is out of my expertise. Not only does he consider this proof that the earth can be no older than ten thousand years but he also points out that a greater magnetic strength in the past would reduce C dates. All radiometric dating methods are fan on assumptions about events that happened in the past.

Barnes has claimedCosmic rays in the upper atmosphere

Answers to Creationist Attacks on Carbon Dating